Ahmadi/Qadiani propagandists approach their targets strategically, tailoring their discussions based on the listener’s level of knowledge. Their goal is to mislead unsuspecting Muslims by selectively presenting information. If they sense that the individual lacks understanding of Ahmadi beliefs, they showcase selective writings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, particularly his early works on the concept of finality of prophethood, to create a false impression of faithfulness to Islam. However, they deliberately avoid mentioning later writings where he abandoned these views and explicitly claimed prophethood and messengership.
The Misleading Efforts of the Ahmadiyya Community
One of the oldest strategies employed by the Ahmadiyya community is their attempt to be recognized as the “Ahmadi Muslim Community.” Despite being universally rejected by Muslims worldwide and dismissed by both Islamic and secular courts in various countries, they strive to be referred to as “Ahmadi Muslims” and to have their places of worship, such as “Mirzara,” labeled as mosques. They seek to have Islamic terminology applied to their every un-Islamic and heretical practice, even though they do not adhere to the core tenets of Islam.
Manipulative Tactics: Offering Material Gains
The tactics used by Ahmadiyya zealots to lure Muslims are diverse and manipulative. They often begin by offering medical facilities, food, public welfare services, or assistance with business ventures and visas to foreign countries. Initially, they attract people with these benefits, and once they have gained their trust, they inject them with the poisonous ideology of Qadianism. Since many people are not well-versed in religious knowledge, they become vulnerable to such misleading teachings. Those who are knowledgeable about the faith, and are regularly in the company of true scholars, are able to recognize these deceptions and avoid falling into the trap. The real danger lies in those who are ignorant of their faith and have a strong attachment to material wealth. Such individuals are more susceptible to these falsehoods. The combination of ignorance of religion and love for wealth can lead to spiritual destruction.
Contradictions in Ahmadi Beliefs and Practices
The contradictions within the Ahmadiyya community are striking. For example, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the founder of the Ahmadiyya movement, declared in his book Izala-e-Auham that “Qadian” (his birthplace) was the worst place on earth, and its inhabitants were extremely impure and unworthy. Yet, his followers regard Qadian as the holiest place. This paradox is even more puzzling when we consider that the followers of Mirza Qadiani seem unable to accept his own judgment about Qadian, nor are they able to justify their contradictory position with any logical reasoning. This situation leaves them in a state of internal confusion and contradiction.
Shifting Focus: Avoiding the Core Issue of Finality of Prophethood (PBUH)
If Qadianis realize that the listener is well-informed about Mirza Qadiani’s writings and shifting positions (claims), they avoid discussing the concept of Finality of Prophethood altogether. Instead, they divert the conversation to unrelated topics, such as the life and death of Jesus (Hazrat Esa (A.S)), his ascension and second coming, or the advent of Imam Mahdi (R.A). Through misleading arguments, they try to convince others that Jesus (Hazrat Esa (A.S)) was not physically raised to the sky but passed away, and that his second coming will not involve a descent from the sky but rather his birth on earth. Ultimately, they claim that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is the promised Messiah and the awaited Mahdi.
Flawed Logic: A False Claim to Prophethood
A key question must be asked: what does the life or death of Jesus (Hazrat Esa (A.S)) has to do with Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s claim to prophethood? Even if one were to hypothetically accept the claim that Jesus has passed away, does that prove Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is a prophet? Certainly not. This logic is fundamentally flawed and baseless.
The Finality of Prophethood: A Clear Islamic Belief
In Surah Al-Ahzab, verse 40, the Qur’an clearly refers to the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as “Khatam un-Nabiyyin” (the Seal of the Prophets). Numerous authentic Hadiths, the sayings of the companions (Sahabah), the early generations of Muslims (Tabi’een), and scholars throughout Islamic history confirm that the term “Seal of the Prophets” means “the Last Prophet.” This interpretation was universally agreed upon during the time of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and the Caliphate of Abu Bakr (R.A). However, Qadianis reject this clear understanding and instead offer an alternative interpretation, claiming that the term does not mean “the Last Prophet,” but something entirely different. Such reinterpretations, which contradict the Arabic language and historical consensus, are a clear path to misguidance.
Contradictions in Mirza Qadiani’s Claims
The truth is, Mirza Qadiani’s made several contradictory claims throughout his life. These claims evolved over time—from minor assertions to bold claims of prophethood, legislative authority, and eventually being the seal of the prophets. Such contradictions, coupled with falsehoods, led to his rejection as a legitimate figure, and those who follow him remain lost in misguidance.
Diversion Tactics: The Claim of Messiah and Mahdi
Rather than addressing these inconsistencies or Mirza Qadiani’s questionable character, Qadiani propagandists shift attention to the advent of Imam Mahdi (R.A), attempting to portray Mirza Qadiani as both the promised Messiah and the awaited Mahdi. However, the Qur’an and Hadith make it clear that Jesus (Hazrat Esa (A.S)) and Imam Mahdi (R.A) are two separate figures. Jesus (Hazrat Esa (A.S) will descend from the heavens near the end times, while Imam Mahdi will be born on earth. Mirza Qadiani’s claims are baseless because they do not align with the clear signs and descriptions mentioned in the Hadiths.
Historical False Claims of the Mahdi
It is also important to note that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was not the only person to falsely claim to be the Mahdi. For example, in the 19th century, Muhammad Ahmad of Sudan made a similar claim. Throughout history, there have been numerous baseless assertions about the advent of Imam Mahdi (R.A). However, the Hadiths provide clear and detailed descriptions of the signs and circumstances surrounding the true Mahdi’s arrival, leaving no room for confusion.
The world is aware that Mirza Qadiani claimed prophethood. One of the common tactics used by Qadianis is to downplay this claim when speaking to individuals who have some knowledge of Islam. Initially, they will say that Mirza Qadiani never claimed to be a prophet, but rather a reformer, a Messiah, or the Mahdi. However, when it comes time for the pledge to allegiance, they (Qadianis) say, “I believe in Mirza Qadiani, and anyone who does not believe in him is a kafir (infidel).” Mirza Qadiani himself wrote in many places that anyone who does not believe in him is a kafir.
The Lure of Materialism: A Path to Misguidance
It is an unfortunate and tragic situation when individuals, motivated by worldly desires, such as the lure of foreign visas or nationalities, declare themselves as Qadianis or members of any other non-Muslim group. In doing so, they adorn themselves with the curse of disbelief, which will have serious consequences in this world and the Hereafter. Muslims must remain vigilant against such deceptions. Understanding the Qur’an and Hadith is essential to safeguard oneself from the traps of the Ahmadiyya movement. By doing so, we can not only protect ourselves from misguidance but also help others stay on the right path.
Qadiani’s Distorted Perception of Their Founder
Furthermore, Ahmadi followers, while recognizing Mirza Qadiani’s teachings, often distance themselves from his decisions. This hypocrisy is evident in their refusal to accept his proclamations, which have caused a divide between them and the rest of the Muslim world. The Islamic scholars have written extensively on this issue, and the fatwas issued by the martyrs of the finality of prophethood, such as the late Mufti Muhammad Yusuf Ladhiani, have provided decisive documentation on the matter. These fatwas have become a key reference point for those seeking to understand the doctrinal errors and contradictions in the Ahmadiyya movement.
Conclusion: Protecting Ourselves from Misguidance
It is crucial for Muslims to be aware of these deceptive tactics and the inconsistencies in the claims made by the Ahmadiyya movement. The truth, as outlined in the Qur’an and Hadith, remains clear: the finality of prophethood is unequivocally established, and the promised Messiah and Mahdi are distinct figures with signs and circumstances known to all who seek knowledge. To fall into the trap of Qadiani’s propaganda is to risk abandoning the core teachings of Islam. By grounding ourselves in authentic Islamic knowledge, we not only protect ourselves from misguidance but also become beacons of truth for others, guiding them back to the path of righteousness.
