Introduction
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, the founder of the Ahmadiyya movement, made numerous contradictory claims throughout his life. His ever-changing stance on fundamental theological and prophetic matters highlights a pattern of deception, manipulation, and inconsistency. A true prophet, as defined by Islamic teachings, must remain steadfast in his claims and must never make a false prophecy. However, Qadiani not only contradicted himself on multiple occasions but also made prophecies that failed miserably. This article presents an analysis of his most glaring contradictions, his false predictions, and the deceptive nature of his writings, all drawn from his own books.
The Contradictions in Mirza Qadiani’s Claims of Prophethood
One of the most evident contradictions in Qadiani’s claims was regarding his own status. Initially, he denied being a prophet, asserting that he was merely a reformer or mujaddid (revivalist). In Hamamatul Bushra (Page 79), he wrote:
“I am not a Prophet, and to claim so would be a grave falsehood.”
Similarly, in Izala Auham (Page 533), he explicitly stated:
“The door to prophethood is permanently closed. No new Prophet can come.”
However, later in his writings, he made a direct U-turn and declared himself a prophet. In Haqiqat-ul-Wahi (Page 28), he wrote:
“I am a Prophet and Messenger.”
Furthermore, in Tajalliyat-e-Ilahiya (Page 25), he attempted to justify his contradiction:
“God has told me that I am a Prophet and Messenger.”
This inconsistency, found within his own writings, is evidence of deliberate fabrication. If he was receiving divine revelations, why did his stance change over time?
False Prophecies and Their Failures
A hallmark of a false prophet is the failure of his prophecies. Mirza Qadiani made several predictions that were never fulfilled, proving that his so-called divine inspirations were nothing but lies.
- The False Prophecy of Lekh Ram’s Death
Mirza Qadiani prophesied in Haqiqat-ul-Wahi (Page 289):
“Lekh Ram will die within six years in a horrible manner as punishment.”
While Lekh Ram was killed, the event did not match the conditions of Qadiani’s prophecy. Historical records suggest that he was assassinated, not killed by divine punishment. The inaccurate timeline further exposed Qadiani’s deception.
- The False Prophecy of Muhammadi Begum’s Marriage
One of Qadiani’s most infamous false predictions was about a woman named Muhammadi Begum. He wrote in Tazkira (Page 177):
“God has revealed to me that Muhammadi Begum will definitely become my wife.”
However, she never married him and instead married another man, with whom she lived her entire life. Despite his insistence that divine revelation had decreed this marriage, it never occurred, showing that his prophecy was baseless.
- The False Prophecy About Abdullah Atham’s Death
During a public debate with Christian missionary Abdullah Atham, Qadiani declared:
“Atham will die within 15 months unless he accepts Islam.”
Atham did not accept Islam and lived for many years beyond the deadline of this prophecy, further proving that Qadiani’s so-called divine inspiration was a lie.
Mirza Qadiani’s Lies About His Physical Health
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani made multiple claims regarding his health, asserting that he was divinely protected from sickness and would live a long life.
In Tadhkirah (Page 320), he stated:
“God has told me that I will never suffer from any severe illness and will live a long life.”
However, historical records show that he suffered from numerous ailments, including:
- Frequent headaches
- Diabetes
- Dysentery
- Paralysis
Moreover, in Al-Bushra (Page 23), he claimed:
“I will live for at least 80 years, as per divine revelation.”
Yet, he died at the age of 68 in 1908, directly contradicting his own prophecy.
The Deception in Mirza Qadiani’s Arabic Writings
Mirza Qadiani often boasted about his command over the Arabic language, claiming that it was divinely inspired and unmatched by any scholar. In Noor-ul-Haq (Page 55), he wrote:
“No one can match my Arabic writing, as it is divinely inspired.”
However, multiple Islamic scholars have pointed out major grammatical errors in his Arabic books. Moreover, research has revealed that many passages from his Arabic works were plagiarized from older texts, further proving that his claims were fraudulent.
Mirza Qadiani’s Contradictory Statements on Jihad
Qadiani made conflicting statements regarding Jihad, misleading his followers and contradicting traditional Islamic teachings.
In Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya (Page 45), he wrote:
“Jihad is a fundamental duty of Muslims, and resisting oppression is mandatory.”
However, later in Tadhkirah (Page 505), he reversed his stance:
“Jihad is no longer necessary, as we are in a time of peace.”
He initially opposed British colonial rule, but later he declared that the British were divinely appointed rulers. This shift was politically motivated and exposed his willingness to alter religious principles for his own benefit.
Conclusion
The life and writings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani are filled with contradictions, false prophecies, and outright fabrications. His inconsistent claims regarding prophethood, his failed predictions, his false assurances of health and longevity, and his plagiarism of Arabic works all expose him as a fraud. His theological inconsistencies, particularly regarding Jihad, further prove that his movement was not based on divine guidance but rather on self-serving deception.
A true prophet does not contradict himself, nor do his prophecies fail. Mirza Qadiani, however, repeatedly changed his claims and failed in his predictions. The overwhelming evidence from his own books serves as irrefutable proof that he was not divinely appointed but rather a fabricator who misled his followers for personal gain.
